Skip to Main Content

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion - Research and Resources: Ohio

This guide serves as a starting point to learn about anti-oppression, inclusion, and privilege, as well as to provide resources to key social justice issues.

Senate

House

Colleges Affected by DEI Legislation

Ashland University

Details: Ashland University renamed its diversity office as the Office of Community and Belonging.
 

Kent State University

Details: Kent State University merged its human resources and diversity, equity, and inclusion divisions to create the Division of People, Culture, and Belonging. The new division will include an individual DEI office.
 

University of Toledo

Details: The University of Toledo closed its Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and moved the office’s programs and activities to other departments, including the Multicultural Emerging Scholars Program and the Catharine S. Eberly Center for Women, now managed by the student-affairs division, and training and campus resources for faculty and staff members, now managed by the provost’s office.
 

In the Media

What it means

Under Ohio Senate Bill 83, private institutions would only receive funding from the chancellor of higher education if they comply with a list of commitments, including intellectual diversity, freedom of speech, and syllabus compliance.

Colleges in the state could not require DEI courses or training for students, faculty, and staff. They also would not be permitted to use "political or ideological litmus tests" in hiring or promoting faculty members.

SB 83 now heads to the Ohio House, where hearings are underway on a companion piece of legislation. But as support grows among Republican politicians, opposition to the legislation continues to grow in Ohio's institutions of higher education.

On June 15, 2023, Rep. Edwards, introduced into Ohio's two-year state budget plan several elements of Senate Bill 83.

Ohio State's Board of Trustees issued a rare public statement Tuesday, saying SB 83 raised "important questions about 21st-century education," but the legislation as it's currently written could "undermine the shared governance model of universities, risk weakened academic rigor, or impose extensive and expensive new reporting mandates."